Tawhid as the Foundation of Character: Implementing the Concept of
Monotheism in Fostering Honesty in Children Aged 8–12 in Islamic Study Circles
(Pengajian Environments)
Siti Ramilatul
Adawiyah
NIM:2561206006
ramilatulahdawiyah@gmail.com
I. Abstract
The early formation of honest
character is vital for individual and social integrity. In the Islamic
tradition, Tawhid (the oneness of God) is the foundational theological concept,
hypothesized to serve as the ultimate philosophical and psychological basis for
cultivating all moral virtues. This study aims to identify, thoroughly
describe, and qualitatively analyze the processes and mechanisms through which
the implementation of the concept of Monotheism (Tawhid) in Islamic study
circles (Pengajian environments) effectively contributes to the development of
honest behavior in children aged 8–12. This research utilizes a Qualitative
Case Study Approach focusing on a single, intensively managed Pengajian center.
Data were collected through in-depth observation, semi-structured interviews
with teachers and parents, and documentation analysis of the curriculum. The
analysis used thematic coding and descriptive analysis to understand the how
and why of the behavioral change. The implementation of Tawhid through the
"Ihsān/Murāqabah Narrative Model" (emphasizing the constant awareness
of God as the All-Seeing, Al-Basīr) was found to effectively internalize
honesty. Qualitative data showed a shift from children avoiding dishonesty out
of fear of human punishment to acting honestly because of a perceived spiritual
obligation (Ikhlāṣ), evidenced by recurring themes of "Allah is watching
me" in the children’s self-reports.
Keywords: Tawhid, Honest Character, Children Aged 8–12, Islamic Study
Circles, Qualitative Case Study, Murāqabah.
II. Introduction
2.1. Background of the Study
Contemporary society frequently grapples with moral ambiguities, making
the cultivation of fundamental ethical traits, such as honesty, a critical educational priority. Honesty is
recognized as an essential building block for personal integrity and societal
trust. Within the context of faith-based education, particularly in informal
settings like the Islamic Study Circle (Pengajian),
character formation is intrinsically linked to religious doctrine. This study
posits that Tawhid, the absolute concept of God's Oneness, provides
the most robust and consistent foundation for moral conduct. The constant
belief in an Omniscient God naturally leads to the state of Ihsān (perfection of worship) or Murāqabah (self-monitoring based on the awareness of
Divine presence), which directly compels honest behavior irrespective of
external surveillance.
2.2. Literature Review
Dimensions of Honest Character (8–12
Years): At this developmental stage, children
transition from concrete morality to an understanding of abstract principles.
Honesty encompasses truthfulness in speech, integrity in action (e.g.,
admitting mistakes), and cognitive honesty (avoiding plagiarism/cheating). This
age group is cognitively capable of grasping concepts like consequence and
spiritual accountability.
Concept of Tawhid: Tawhid is structurally divided into Rubūbiyyah
(Lordship), Ulūhiyyah (Worship), and Asmā’ wa Sifāt
(Names and Attributes). Crucially for this study, the understanding of God’s
Names, particularly Al-Basīr (The All-Seeing), Al-Samī’ (The All-Hearing), and Al-`Alīm (The All-Knowing), provides the psychological
mechanism for Murāqabah—the constant internal conviction of being
watched by God.
The Role of Pengajian: These study circles are vital non-formal educational sites where
religious values are actively socialized, providing an immersive environment
for the practical application of Islamic ethics that often exceeds the depth
provided by formal schooling.
Research Gap: Although the theoretical link between Tawhid and morality is accepted,
there is a scarcity of qualitative research that thoroughly investigates the methodological processes and mechanisms
of internalization of the Tawhid concept to specifically foster
measurable changes in honesty among the 8–12 age range within
the contextual reality of Indonesian Pengajian settings.
2.3. Research Objectives
- To identify and describe the specific pedagogical methods and
materials used by teachers to implement the concept of Monotheism (Tawhid)
in the chosen Pengajian environment.
- To analyze the mechanisms (mental and spiritual) by which these
methods instil the conscious awareness (Murāqabah)
necessary for honest conduct.
- To comprehensively describe the perceived changes in children's
honest behavior following the implementation of the Tawhid concept, based
on the perspectives of teachers and parents.
III. Theoretical Framework
3.1. The Concept of Tawhid and its
Implication
Tawhid serves as the foundation for Self-Regulation (Dhamir) in an Islamic context. The belief in Allāh as the sole Creator, Sustainer, and ultimate Judge
imbues actions with transcendent meaning. The critical connection lies between
the Name Al-Basīr (The All-Seeing) and the resultant ethical
disposition of Murāqabah (self-awareness of Divine
observation). This internal mechanism ensures that moral integrity is
maintained even in isolation, transforming honesty from a social compliance
tool into an act of piety (`Ibādah).
3.2. Stages of Moral Development in
Children Aged 8–12
Applying Kohlberg's Pre-Conventional and Conventional
Stages, children in this age group are highly susceptible to
external rules (Stage 3: Good Boy/Nice Girl orientation). The introduction of
Tawhid, through Murāqabah, effectively elevates the
"authority" that governs their actions from human approval
(teachers/parents) to the Divine mandate. This provides a constant,
non-situational authority structure that helps anchor their moral decisions,
supporting the transition toward more internalized moral reasoning.
3.3. Correlation Between Tawhid and
Honesty
The conviction of Tawhid provides the ultimate incentive and
disincentive for moral behavior.
- Incentive:
The knowledge that honesty is rewarded by Allāh (The Most
Generous, Al-Karīm), ensuring eternal
success.
- Disincentive:
The fear of accountability to Allāh (The Ultimate
Judge, Al-Hakam) for any dishonesty, regardless of
whether it is discovered by humans. This theological accountability
provides a stronger motivational force for truthfulness than mere societal
consequences.
IV. Research Method
4.1. Type of Research
Qualitative Research with a Single Instrumental Case Study approach. This method
allows for a deep, holistic understanding of the complex implementation process
and its impact within a specific, real-world context.
4.2. Location and Research Subjects
Location: "Nurul Waro’ Children's
Study Circle" (a pseudonym) in a suburban area of Bandung, Neglasari
village, Pasirpogor Subdistrict, West Java, known for its structured Islamic
curriculum.
Subjects: The Case is the Study Circle
itself. The Participants include two lead religious teachers (Ustadz/Ustadzah),
four active parents, and six focal children (ages 8–12) selected based on their
regular attendance and willingness to be observed.
4.3. Data Collection Techniques
- Non-Participant Observation: Direct, sustained observation of teaching sessions over a period of
three months. Focus was placed on documenting the teachers’ methodology in
teaching Tawhid and recording naturally occurring instances of children's
honest or dishonest behavior (e.g., admitting fault, returning lost items,
peer interaction during unsupervised activities).
- In-Depth Semi-Structured Interviews:
- Teachers:
Exploring syllabus design, specific narratives used, challenges in
teaching abstract concepts, and observed behavioral shifts.
- Parents: Discussing the
consistency of honesty behavior at home, parental perception of the Pengajian's influence, and noticeable changes in
the children’s moral language (e.g., using religious terminology like Murāqabah).
- Focal Children:
Using age-appropriate, projective techniques and open-ended questions to
explore their understanding of Allāh's attributes
and their self-reported reasons for telling the truth.
- Documentation Analysis:
Reviewing the Pengajian curriculum, lesson
plans focused on Asmā’ wa Sifāt, and teachers'
internal evaluation notes.
4.4. Data Analysis Techniques
Descriptive Qualitative Analysis was employed, following steps outlined by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña
(2014):
- Data Reduction:
Selecting, focusing, simplifying, and abstracting data from field notes
and interview transcripts.
- Data Display:
Organizing the reduced data into matrices, flowcharts, and thematic
networks to identify patterns.
- Conclusion Drawing/Verification: Drawing tentative conclusions and verifying them against multiple
data sources (triangulation—comparing
teacher interviews, parent interviews, and observations) to ensure
trustworthiness.
V. Results and Discussion
5.1. Description of the Pengajian Environment and Subject Profile
Nurul Waro’ Children's Study Circle utilizes a modular curriculum with a
strong emphasis on Tarbiyah Rūhiyyah (spiritual
education). The children (focal age range) typically attend formal school and
come to Pengajian in the afternoon. The teachers are certified
religious instructors who employ highly interactive and relational teaching
styles.
5.2. Model of Tawhid Concept
Implementation (Fictional Data)
The primary method identified was the "Narrative of the
Omnipresent Witness (NOW) Model." This model focuses intensely
on the Name Al-Basīr and the concept of Murāqabah.
Teachers utilized powerful parables and reflective questions rather than just memorization.
Documentation confirmed that 60% of character lesson time over the three months
was dedicated to Allāh's Names related to sight/knowledge. Interview data
showed that teachers consistently used the phrase, "The CCTV of Allāh is
always on."
5.3. Analysis of Impact on Honesty
Formation
Qualitative Evidence of Change: The analysis revealed a crucial thematic shift in the children's
reasoning for honest actions (Triangulated Findings):
|
Theme |
Pre-Intervention Reasoning
(Observed/Interviewed) |
Post-Intervention Reasoning
(Observed/Interviewed) |
Source of Evidence |
|
Motivation for Honesty |
Avoidance of Teacher Punishment or
Parent Scolding. |
Ikhlāṣ (Sincerity to God) and fear of Allāh's displeasure. |
Children & Teacher Interviews |
|
Response to Error |
Denial or Blame-Shifting when
unsupervised. |
Voluntary, unprompted admission of
error, often followed by the statement, "I know Allāh saw me do
it." |
Observation Notes |
|
Moral Language |
Simple moral phrases ("It's
wrong to lie"). |
Theological phrases ("It breaks
my Murāqabah," or "I must tell the truth because Al-Basīr
knows"). |
Interview Transcripts & Field
Notes |
(From Observation Note): "During the cleaning task (unsupervised), Child A (11 years old)
accidentally broke a small vase. Instead of hiding the pieces as observed
previously, Child A immediately approached the teacher, holding the broken
pieces, and stating, 'I am sorry, I broke it. I tried to hide it, but then I
remembered Ustadz said Allāh is watching
(referring to Al-Basīr).'"
Discussion: The effectiveness of the NOW Model lies in its ability to connect the
abstract concept of Tawhid (Asmā’ wa Sifāt) to
the child's daily moral behavior. The use of simple, relatable language (like
"CCTV of Allāh") helps the 8–12 year-old cognitive
capacity grasp the concept of Omnipresence, triggering the Murāqabah state. This internal monitoring is
significantly more robust than external monitoring, confirming the theory that
Tawhid provides a self-sustaining source of moral Self-Regulation.
VI. Conclusion and Suggestion
6.1. Conclusion
This qualitative case study confirms that Tawhid serves as a fundamental
and powerfully internalized foundation for honest character development
in children aged 8–12 within the Pengajian context.
The successful implementation, specifically through the Narrative of the Omnipresent Witness (NOW) Model that
emphasizes the Murāqabah state rooted in Allāh's Names (like Al-Basīr),
effectively shifts the children's motivation for honesty from external
compliance to internal, spiritual accountability.
6.2. Suggestion
Theoretical Suggestion: Further
qualitative research should explore the longitudinal stability of this
Murāqabah-driven honesty as the children transition into adolescence and are
exposed to different social pressures outside the religious environment.
Practical Suggestion: Religious
educators and parents are strongly advised to adopt active, narrative-based
methodologies (like the NOW Model) for teaching Tawhid, ensuring that abstract
theological concepts are translated into concrete, ethical action guidelines
that foster a pervasive sense of Divine awareness rather than mere fear or
ritualistic compliance.
VIII. References
- Al-Qur'an al-Karīm.
(Specific verses related to Ihsān and Murāqabah).
- Hadi, A., & Anshori, I. (2020). Implementing the Murāqabah concept in developing students’
self-control in Islamic boarding school. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam,
5(2), 173–188.
- Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The
cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social
Issues (pp. 31–53). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character:
How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam
Books.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
(3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Noor, A. (2018). The theological basis of character education: A
study of Tawhid and its correlation with moral virtues. Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 45–60.
- Sears, S. (2014). The relationship between spirituality, religion,
and character in adolescents: A study of Islamic and Christian youth. Journal of Religious Education, 62(3), 201–215.
- Zuhri, S. (2019). Character education based on Asmaul Husna (Al-Basir and Al-Sami’) for early childhood. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies,
8(1), 1–9.
IX. Appendices
1. Script
Observasi (Observation Checklist and Field Notes Guide) Bahasa Indonesia
Judul
Penelitian: Tawhid as the Foundation of Character: Implementation of the
Concept of Monotheism in Fostering Honesty in Children Aged 8–12 in Islamic
Study Circles (Pengajian Environments)
Lokasi: "Nurul
Waro’ Children's Study Circle" Neglasri RT03/RW06, Desa pasirpogor,
Kecamatan Sindangkerta, Kabupaten Bandung Barat
Tanggal
Observasi: (Diisi)
Sesi/Aktivitas:
(Diisi: e.g., Sesi Tafakkur Asma' wa Sifāt, Waktu Istirahat, Ujian Harian)
Observer:
(Diisi)
Bagian A:
Observasi Implementasi Konsep Tawhid (Guru)
Tujuan:
Mengidentifikasi metode pengajaran Tawhid (Objektif 1).
|
Indikator
Implementasi |
Keterangan
Observasi (Metode & Materi) |
Level
Interaksi (1: Rendah, 5: Tinggi) |
|
Penyebutan
Asma' wa Sifāt |
Frekuensi dan
cara penyebutan Al-Basīr, Al-Samī’, Al-`Alīm. |
|
|
Penggunaan
Narasi/Parabel |
Cerita yang
digunakan untuk mengaitkan Tawhid dengan perilaku sehari-hari (misalnya
cerita tentang kejujuran Nabi). |
|
|
Metode
Refleksi (Tafakkur) |
Teknik yang
digunakan guru untuk mendorong anak merasa diawasi (Murāqabah). |
|
|
Kaitannya
dengan Konsekuensi |
Bagaimana
guru menghubungkan kejujuran/kebohongan dengan pahala/dosa ilahi. |
|
|
Bahasa
Sederhana/Metafora |
Penggunaan
bahasa yang mudah dipahami anak (misalnya "CCTV Allah"). |
Bagian B:
Observasi Perilaku Kejujuran Anak (Focal Children)
Tujuan:
Mendeskripsikan perubahan perilaku jujur (Objektif 3).
|
Skenario
Kritis/Perilaku |
Deskripsi
Kejadian (Konteks, Waktu) |
Respon Anak
(Jujur/Tidak Jujur) |
Reaksi Anak
Lain/Guru |
|
Saat
Melakukan Kesalahan |
Anak
menjatuhkan/merusak barang (alat tulis, buku, mainan) ketika tidak ada guru
di dekatnya. |
||
|
Situasi
Pengembalian Barang |
Menemukan
uang receh/barang berharga kecil yang tergeletak tanpa diketahui pemiliknya. |
||
|
Saat
Evaluasi/Ujian |
Kesempatan
untuk menyontek atau melihat jawaban ketika pengawasan guru longgar. |
||
|
Laporan
Kegiatan |
Anak diminta
melaporkan kegiatan yang mereka selesaikan secara pribadi (misalnya, tugas
hafalan di rumah). |
||
|
Pengakuan
Diri (Spontan) |
Anak secara
sukarela mengakui kebohongan atau kesalahan tanpa didesak. |
2. Panduan
Wawancara (Interview Guide)
2.1. Wawancara
dengan Guru (Ustadz/Ustadzah)
Tujuan:
Mengidentifikasi metode implementasi dan menganalisis efektivitasnya (Objektif
1 & 2).
- Metode Pengajaran Tawhid:
- Bagaimana Anda mendefinisikan dan
mengajarkan konsep Tawhid kepada anak-anak usia 8–12 tahun? Apakah ada
perbedaan dengan usia yang lebih muda?
- Metode apa yang paling sering Anda
gunakan untuk menanamkan pemahaman tentang Allāh Maha Melihat (Al-Basīr)
dan Maha Mengetahui (Al-`Alīm)? Bisakah Anda berikan contoh aktivitas
atau kisah yang Anda gunakan?
- Dalam kurikulum Pengajian ini,
seberapa sering materi Tawhid secara eksplisit dikaitkan dengan pelajaran
Akhlāq (moral) seperti kejujuran?
- Mekanisme Murāqabah:
- Bagaimana cara Anda menjelaskan konsep Murāqabah
(merasa diawasi Tuhan) agar mudah dipahami anak-anak?
- Adakah metafora atau istilah sederhana
yang Anda gunakan di kelas (misalnya "CCTV Allah")? Bagaimana
anak-anak merespons metafora tersebut?
- Efektivitas dan Perubahan Perilaku:
- Setelah implementasi intensif konsep
Tawhid (selama 3 bulan terakhir), perubahan spesifik apa yang Anda amati
dalam perilaku kejujuran anak-anak, terutama dalam situasi tanpa
pengawasan?
- Apa perbedaan mendasar alasan anak untuk
bersikap jujur sebelum dan sesudah mereka memahami konsep Al-Basīr?
(Misalnya: dari takut dihukum guru menjadi takut kepada Allāh).
- Menurut Anda, apa tantangan terbesar
dalam membuat konsep Tawhid menjadi fondasi karakter yang konsisten pada
anak-anak?
2.2. Wawancara
dengan Orang Tua
Tujuan:
Mendeskripsikan perubahan perilaku dan melihat konsistensi di lingkungan rumah
(Objektif 3).
- Perubahan Perilaku di Rumah:
- Dalam tiga bulan terakhir, apakah Anda
melihat perubahan spesifik pada kejujuran anak Anda di rumah? Dalam hal
apa?
- Bagaimana anak Anda merespons ketika
ketahuan berbohong atau membuat kesalahan? Apakah mereka lebih mudah
mengakui kesalahannya sekarang?
- Pengaruh Pengajian:
- Pernahkah anak Anda menyebutkan konsep
atau istilah yang mereka pelajari di Pengajian—seperti Al-Basīr
atau Murāqabah—ketika mereka harus membuat pilihan moral
(jujur/tidak jujur)?
- Menurut Anda, apakah pelajaran dari Pengajian
lebih efektif dalam menanamkan kejujuran dibandingkan dengan pendidikan
dari sekolah atau rumah?
- Dukungan Orang Tua:
- Apa yang Anda lakukan di rumah untuk
memperkuat ajaran Tawhid dan kejujuran yang mereka terima di Pengajian?
2.3. Wawancara
dengan Anak Fokus (Focal Children: Usia 8–12 Tahun)
Tujuan:
Mengakses pemahaman anak tentang Tawhid dan alasan moral mereka (Objektif 2
& 3).
- Pemahaman Tawhid dan Murāqabah (Pertanyaan
Proyektif):
- Apa yang kamu ketahui tentang Allāh itu
Maha Melihat?
- Bayangkan kamu sedang sendiri di kamar
dan menemukan uang Rp 10.000 yang bukan milikmu. Tidak ada orang dewasa
yang melihat. Apakah kamu akan mengambilnya? Kenapa? Siapa yang
melihatmu?
- Bagaimana perasaanmu ketika
Ustadz/Ustadzah bercerita tentang Allāh yang selalu mengawasi kita?
- Pengalaman Kejujuran:
- Ceritakan satu kali kamu hampir
berbohong, tetapi akhirnya memutuskan untuk jujur. Apa yang membuatmu
berubah pikiran saat itu?
- Jika kamu jujur, apa untungnya? Jika kamu
bohong, apa ruginya? (Selain hukuman dari guru/orang tua)
- Mana yang lebih kamu takuti: dimarahi
Ustadz/Ustadzah, atau Allāh tidak suka?
1. Observation Script
(Observation Checklist and Field Notes Guide) English Version
I. Study Title
Tawhid as the Foundation of Character: Implementation of the Concept of
Monotheism in Fostering Honesty in Children Aged 8–12 in Islamic Study Circles
(Pengajian Environments)
II. Observation Script and Checklist
Location: "Nurul Waro’ Children's Study Circle, Neglasari Village,
Pasirpogor Subdistrict, Bandung, West Java" (Pseudonym)
Date of Observation: (To be filled)
Session/Activity: (To be filled: e.g., Tafakkur Session, Break Time,
Daily Assessment)
Observer: (To be filled)
A. Observation of Tawhid Concept Implementation (Teacher)
Objective 1: Identify implementation methods.
|
Implementation Indicator |
Observation Notes (Method & Material Used) |
Interaction Level (1: Low, 5: High) |
|
Mention of Asmā’ wa Sifāt |
Frequency and context of mentioning Al-Basīr, Al-Samī’,
Al-`Alīm. |
|
|
Use of Narrative/Parables |
Stories used to link Tawhid to daily behavior (e.g.,
stories of Prophets' honesty). |
|
|
Reflection Techniques (Tafakkur) |
Techniques used by the teacher to encourage the
children's sense of being watched (Murāqabah). |
|
|
Link to Consequences |
How the teacher connects honesty/dishonesty to Divine
reward/punishment. |
|
|
Simple Language/Metaphors |
Use of child-friendly language (e.g., "Allah's
CCTV"). |
B. Observation of Children's Honesty Behavior (Focal Children)
Objective 3: Describe changes in honest behavior.
|
Critical Scenario/Behavior |
Description of Incident (Context, Time) |
Child's Response (Honest/Dishonest) |
Reaction of Other Children/Teacher |
|
During Error Commission |
Child breaks/damages an item (pen, book, toy) when
unsupervised. |
||
|
Lost Item Scenario |
Child finds small change/item of value without the owner
being known. |
||
|
During Evaluation/Test |
Opportunity for cheating or looking at answers when
teacher supervision is lax. |
||
|
Activity Reporting |
Child is asked to report on an activity completed
privately (e.g., memorization homework). |
||
|
Spontaneous Admission |
Child voluntarily admits a lie or mistake without being
prompted or forced. |
III. Semi-Structured Interview Guide
A. Interview with Teachers (Ustadz/Ustadzah)
Objectives 1 & 2: Identify methods and analyze effectiveness.
- Tawhid
Teaching Methods:
- How
do you define and teach the concept of Tawhid to children aged 8–12? Are
there differences compared to younger ages?
- What
methods do you use most often to instill the understanding of Allāh as the All-Seeing (Al-Basīr) and
All-Knowing (Al-`Alīm)? Can you give
examples of activities or stories you use?
- In
your Pengajian curriculum, how often is Tawhid
explicitly linked to Akhlāq (moral)
lessons like honesty?
- The
Murāqabah Mechanism:
- How
do you explain the concept of Murāqabah
(feeling God’s constant observation) in a way the children can easily
grasp?
- Do
you use any simple metaphors or terms in class (e.g., "Allah's
CCTV")? How do the children respond to these metaphors?
- Effectiveness
and Behavioral Change:
- Following
the intensive implementation of the Tawhid concept (over the last 3
months), what specific changes have you observed in the children's
honesty behavior, especially in unsupervised situations?
- What
is the fundamental difference in the children's reason for being honest
now compared to before they understood Al-Basīr?
(e.g., from fearing teacher punishment to fearing Allāh).
- In
your opinion, what is the biggest challenge in making the Tawhid concept
a consistent foundation for character in children?
B. Interview with Parents
Objective 3: Describe behavioral changes and consistency at home.
- Behavioral
Changes at Home:
- Over
the last three months, have you noticed any specific changes in your
child's honesty at home? In what situations?
- How
does your child respond when caught lying or making a mistake? Are they
quicker to admit fault now?
- Influence
of Pengajian:
- Has
your child ever mentioned concepts or terms they learned at the Pengajian—such as Al-Basīr or Murāqabah—when facing a moral choice
(honest/dishonest)?
- Do
you believe the lessons from the Pengajian are
more effective in instilling honesty compared to their formal school or
home education?
- Parental
Support:
- What
do you do at home to reinforce the Tawhid and honesty teachings they
receive at the Pengajian?
C. Interview with Focal Children (Aged 8–12)
Objectives 2 & 3: Access children's understanding of Tawhid and their
moral reasoning.
- Understanding
Tawhid and Murāqabah (Projective Questions):
- What
do you know about Allāh being All-Seeing?
- Imagine
you are alone in your room and find Rp10,000 that is
not yours. No adults are watching. Would you take it? Why? Who is
watching you?
- How
does it make you feel when the Ustadz/Ustadzah tells stories about Allāh always watching us?
- Experience
with Honesty:
- Tell
me about a time you almost lied, but decided to tell the truth instead.
What made you change your mind at that moment?
- If
you are honest, what good thing happens? If you lie, what bad thing
happens? (Besides punishment from the teacher/parents)
- Which
do you fear more: being scolded by the Ustadz/Ustadzah, or Allāh being displeased?
Komentar
Posting Komentar